With thanks to Scott Compton via Bill Syraja
Folks, Terrain Theory is awesome and it's a great approach to live systems, but we must keep in mind that Germ Theory simply doesn't "go away" and you can knee-jerk conclude because of Terrain theory that "viruses don't exist" to fit your paradigm.
Both Terrain and Germ Theory can live side-by-side with each other. Terrain Theory tells us that disease arises primarily from internal imbalances within the body rather than solely from external pathogens like viruses or bacteria.
When I see posts say, "Because Terrain Theory is a better approach and more accurate, viruses don't exist," it's clear the person that upholds Terrain Theory doesn't realize Terrain Theory doesn't say this at all. Yes, it's possible some viral particles are hard or even impossible to isolate. However, it's not an invalidation of them outright. Once again, this is why it's important when doing Science to ask the question, "Does it look less likely or more likely?" In this case, is it more likely Viruses Exist or not? Let's explore this deeper.
Viruses are generally considered not alive. Here's why: viruses do not have any independent metabolism: Viruses lack the cellular machinery to carry out essential life processes like energy production and metabolism.
Viruses are essentially inert particles. They cannot reproduce, grow, or respond to theirenvironment. Viruses rely entirely on the host cell's machinery for replication. They hijack the host cell's resources to produce more virus particles.. like a parasite would.
In essence, viruses exist in a gray area between living and non-living entities, but possess genetic material and can evolve, but they lack many of the key characteristics typically associated with living organisms. One could say viruses have their own DNA and RNA, but could have come about from a bacteria's materials, a moUld, plant or fungi's materials, and so forth to pull it quickly into Terrain Theory. If you were not aware, it appears a significant portion of our genome consists of remnants of ancient viral infections that have become integrated into our DNA over evolutionary time. These are called endogenous retroviruses (ERVs)..
Usually, humans are not capable of putting a protein back up into our own DNA. To do that requires an enzyme called "reverse transcriptase," which is actually at the heart of genetic engineering. I should know, because I've used this enzyme first hand in past biolabs. The idea of this enzyme is that it can take protein expression from one organism and pull it back into another organism to make it produce the protein desired. This is how Plasmid DNAs also came about, and more important, WHY THEY ARE ERRONOUSLY AND DANGEROUSLY been found in the c0v!d Vxxxxxs!.
And to make matters worse, our acient, outdated DNA that's not really used anymore can get activated from time to time under certain conditions. In this case, if we're under more oxidative stress, like let's say you live next to a phone tower or you're eating tons of fructose daily or you're an alcoholic drinking all of the time, you might be turning on some of the ancient DNA sequences and producing Reverse Transcriptase… meaning, certain types of proteins that you may not want in your genome might start getting placed into your DNA sequence somewhere on some chromosome. And once it's in there, your entire human line from that time forward could also get affected if it influences your gametes (eggs or sperm).
We could be facIng this situation in to the future: A person's DNA line could permanently be altered with vxxxx's due to the new mRNA technology and forever putting the spike protein inserted into people's DNA without a shutoff valve. This is going to be explored by scientists and doctors into the future to know if this is what we're dealing with…. literally scientists playing God with our DNA. The BioEthics around this topic needs to get explored and talked about in-depth, for our own DNA integrity.
If you currently use Terrain Theory to dismiss all viral materials outright, I'd like to ask you to pull back from that frame of dismissal and have an approach actual scientists have when using the Scientific Method: "What's more likely or less likely?" Science isn't about Proofs or Beliefs to fit your paradigm.
If you use it that way, you're gonna do a huge disservice to the entire Health Movement. That's why I'm putting you under my microscope when I see it. Be honest and say, "I think it's far, far less less likely viruses don't exist" if that helps. Then you're giving yourself an out when you read a paper like
If you're gonna try to continue to disprove viruses altogether, I'm supporting you, don't get me wrong. I can probably help you too. Wisdom of the Scientific Method tells you many things: the 1.4 million articles in the Science right now on Viruses just won't go away until you offer reasons why viruses don't exist, how you'd like to define the genetic material into the future and also show how all of these 1.4 million previous papers with all of the techniques are flawed. That's possible to do.
However, until then, spewing that "viruses don't exist" because a few virologists have said so isn't actual "evidence." It's following a crowed. Here is why my stance on viruses is a blended model where Terrain Theory and Germ Theory can both be applied.
Case in point, when Level 4 Biohazards like Ebola and Hantavirus have been isolated in culture and frozen away in a lab, would you trust your ideology to save you? Would you say to yourself, "No one in Africa caves where they got ebola from ever died." So therefore in this Level 4 Biohazard Lab, would you be careless and believe these viruses are not a threat? Or would you handle them with care "just in case I'm wrong about my assessment?"
If you're that confident that "viruses" don't exist, but you also know something is getting people super-sick and killing people, then you need to do the work to propose what's going on instead… else, you look very reckless and careless with your ideology…. and, you're undermining the entire movement to clamp down on the Vxxx issue at hand with mRNA technology. In other words, realize your actions in this realm by spreading information that "viruses don't exist." I actually look at you as possibly being part of the problem and maybe taken advantage of by a psyops by being so "on/off" about this complex issue.
